|
Click here or on the Above Picture to View
Information About a Specific Building
Illinois
State
University
has recently completed a comprehensive Facilities Condition Assessment of all
major campus facilities. The
primary objective of this assessment was to identify the maintenance and
capital renewal expenditures necessary to improve the condition of campus
facilities and infrastructure in order to develop budgetary options for capital
planning. The tables below
represent an overview of replacement costs, maintenance backlogs, and facility
condition indices within the general revenue facilities, bond revenue
facilities, and infrastructure sub-categories.
|
Facilities
|
Replacement
Costs
|
Maintenance Backlog
|
FCI
|
|
General
Revenue
|
$565,709,208
|
$247,718,309
|
43.79%
|
|
Bond
Revenue
|
$532,250,570
|
$242,859,125
|
45.63%
|
|
|
$1,097,959,778
|
$490,577,434
|
44.68%
|
|
Infrastructure
Systems
|
Replacement
Costs
|
Maintenance Backlog
|
FCI
|
|
Chilled
Water Supply & Return
|
$3,802,378
|
$456,200
|
12.00%
|
|
Compressed
Air
|
$82,020
|
0
|
0
|
|
Condensate
Pumped Discharge
|
$987,990
|
$198,857
|
20.13%
|
|
Domestic
Water
|
$2,736,796
|
$134,270
|
4.91%
|
|
Electrical
Distribution
|
$2,696,330
|
$255,660
|
9.48%
|
|
High
Pressure Steam Supply & Return
|
$2,851,026
|
$995,364
|
34.91%
|
|
Low
Pressure Steam
|
$2,495
|
0
|
0
|
|
Sanitary
Sewer
|
$3,127,462
|
$502,630
|
16.07%
|
|
|
$16,286,497
|
$2,542,981
|
15.61%
|
Replacement
cost represents the Current Replacement Value (CRV) of a facility and is the
hypothetical expense of rebuilding the existing facility in a manner
representing the original construction using current construction costs,
materials, and methods. The CRV is
not the facility’s appraised value nor does it represent the cost to replicate
the original building with today’s amenities not normal to the time of original
construction.
The maintenance backlog is an estimate of costs necessary to repair building
systems that have surpassed their expected useful life using current
construction standards and meeting today’s applicable building codes.
Some examples of building systems include mechanical, electrical,
plumbing, lighting, roofing, flooring, and interior finishes.
The
Facilities Condition Index (FCI) is an indication of the deficiency value
rating of a building. It is
calculated by dividing the estimated cost of current deficiencies by the
replacement value of the facility and is typically expressed as a percentage.
National standards suggest that buildings with an FCI greater than 10%
are in poor condition.
An
aggregate FCI of 44.68% evidences the overall condition of campus facilities
was found to be in fair to poor condition.
General revenue facilities on the campus of
Illinois
State
University
had FCIs
ranging from .05% to 72.38%, whereas bond revenue facilities had FCIs ranging
from 0% to 84.92%.
The
overall campus infrastructure was found to be in good to fair condition.
Individual infrastructure systems had FCIs ranging from 0% to 34.91%
with an aggregate average of 15.61%.
Several
conclusions can be made from the data provided.
The total maintenance backlog for
Illinois
State
University
is
$490,577,434, or approximately $95.50 per square foot.
It is not necessary to completely eliminate the entire current backlog
nor does a high FCI indicate that an individual building needs to be replaced.
The data provides information required to prioritize needed repairs and
improve the condition of buildings.
A plan for making repairs must be implemented and funding sources for such
repairs must be identified. If
building systems continue to surpass their expected useful life, the backlog
will increase and the condition of buildings will worsen.
The
decision to invest resources to address maintenance and future renewal of
systems must be analyzed in the context of overall facility needs of
Illinois
State
University
.
It is imperative that the investment in renovations of each facility be
considered over a period of time to determine its impact on the Academic
Mission, Master Plan, and for potential benefit of the repair.
The amount of current maintenance backlog and anticipated cost of future
renewal over the next several years is enormous.
The funding needed to reduce the overall FCI must be considered in a
feasible manner based on available resources.
|